cyclists inciting
change thru live exchangeThe future of Critical Mass in New York City remains uncertain, as environmental group TIME’S UP! is forced to foot the bill for an impending court battle.
August 15, 2005
By: Liz Elliott and Shay Sanchez :: C.I.C.L.E.
Photography: Peter Meitzler
As a landmark court case threatens to shut down New York’s popular Critical Mass ride, and forces one organization to take the blame, we take a look at the last year of controversy surrounding the ride and at the case brought against TIME’S UP, a pro bike environmental group caught in the middle. This is a case that not only threatens the continuation of the ride itself, but also New Yorker’s First Amendment rights to free speech and free assembly due to the case’s far reaching implications.
Inspired by the tremendously successful CM ride in San Francisco, a handful of cyclists in New York City form their own CM ride in 1993. As the ride increases in popularity over the years, there are occasional incidents with police resulting in small chases and a few random arrests; these occur mostly during Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s term in office. But once Michael Bloomberg is sworn in as New York’s new Mayor, the ride, despite its ever increasing numbers exists without incident for several years prior to the 2004 Republican National Convention. The Police even help to facilitate the ride in summer when the ride participation jumps. Police often assist in what is known as "corking"-- blocking intersections to allow the riders to safely pass through, even through red lights, in an effort to keep the ride together and moving through the streets quickly. The relationship between the riders and the police during this time is mostly friendly.
Bike Summer 2003 in New York proves to be a tremendous boon to Critical Mass as ride participants number in the thousands both during and after the event. The large numbers diminish as winter approaches, but participation once again returns to the previous average of 1,000 to 2,000 riders as the weather warms several months before the RNC convention. Shortly before the convention is to take place, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly orders a crackdown on Critical Mass and the ride falls victim to systematic harassment and arrests due to this sudden policy shift.
Many out of towners and New Yorkers take to the streets on their bikes in protest just days before the RNC and Critical Mass swells to over 5000 riders. Hundreds of CM participants are arrested for minor traffic infractions that would normally only warrant a traffic ticket for a motorist. Bikes are also illegally confiscated without notification. Police use bolt cutters and power saws to remove the bike locks of bicycles secured within the area where the ride and protests take place. However many of the bikes confiscated belong to neighborhood residents, not CM participants or protesters, who then assume that their bikes have been stolen.
The police take aggressive and questionable tactics to drop bicycle ridership in NYC, even in the face of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s request that New Yorkers use their bicycles to get around town in order to ease traffic congestion during the RNC. But it seems to have the reverse affect, the CM rides may have seen a decrease in ridership due to the police harassment, but New York City has seen a substantial increase in bicycle commuting in general.
Regardless of the many cases that are dropped, or the many judgments that are ruled against the city and the police, the same tactics and false arrests continue, well over a year after the RNC. Individuals still find themselves in extended court battles or waiting months to retrieve their confiscated bicycles. But an unexpected new tactic is to hold TIME’S UP, a non-profit all volunteer environmental group, accountable for the CM ride, due to the groups active participation and promotion of the ride. Though Critical Mass is not an organized ride and no single person or group represents the ride, the city still seeks to hold TIME’S UP! responsible.
TIME’S UP! has been very active in promoting sustainable transportation in New York, and like any individual or group, can and does advertise the ride. The city argues that the ride is illegal and that TIME’S UP is promoting an illegal event. This argument flies in the face of reason, because no law in New York City supports this bogus claim, nor can the city, so far, find any Judge to agree with them. The unfortunate thing is how much this financially drains an important group like Time’s Up monetary resources -- spending precious money to defend themselves instead of being able to concentrate those diverted funds into building and promoting a more sustainable and cleaner city as they have done for well over 15 years. The city has spent an estimated several hundred thousand of taxpayer dollars in their effort to stop CM and TIME’S UP. Just imagine what those funds could have gone to? Doesn’t New York City have a lot more serious problems to focus on then a festive once a month bicycle ride?
We wanted to gain an insider perspective of TIME’S UP!, the group, and the City’s case against them. Having heard Ryan Kuonen speak in Los Angeles at a TIME’S UP! fundraiser, we contacted her for this interview. Ryan is a very active member of TIME’S UP!. She, like everyone involved in TIME’S UP!, is an avid bike commuter, commuting from her job as a nanny on the upper east side to her home in Brooklyn. The nanny gig she says is for paying the bills, but on her off time she loves to write sci-fi comic books and stories as well as spend time working with TIME’S UP! One thing Ryan pointed out at the L.A. fundraiser was that even though most of the legal representation is pro bono, fees involved in defending the group are racking up, and expected to continue to do so if appeals have to be made. Already the legal battles have been drawn out by the city, draining TIME’S UP! of valuable time and money.
Can you tell me a bit about the organizational structure of the group and how it operates? I am impressed that none of you is paid staff. On average, how much time do the members of the core group (if you have one) typically devote to this endeavor?
TIME'S UP! is an all volunteer organization. The organization's focus is extensive. We do a lot of workshops-- bicycle repair, welding, puppet-making, gardening--, we have a weekly free movie night, and we lead a host of group rides. Because there are so many projects, it's easy for every person to find their niche. The time spent by each volunteer really depends on what type of project they are involved in, but most of us involved in the core of things spend typically 15+ hours on things.
How did TIME'S UP get started and when and how did bikes become such a focal point of your work?
TIME'S UP! was started 18 years ago by Bill D. in order to promote a cleaner environment. Its focus has always been routed in the way people carry out their daily lives, especially in the terms of community-building, public spaces and transportation. We've been doing group rides for 18 years so bikes have always been a focal point of the group.
Few environmental or peace activist groups seem to promote bikes as part of their education and outreach. I remember a campaign to get citizens to turn off the light when they left a room to save energy, these PSA's were very successful. So why the hang up? What keeps the subject of the bicycle and its use as a means of sustainable transportation in the dark so to speak?
My guess is that peace groups want to keep the message simple. They aren't environmental groups. Just like Greenpeace doesn't typically tackle city transportation issues, they don't take the discussion too deep. Because TIME'S UP! is an urban group we focus on things that affect our lives...like air quality, like community gardens. For us the leap from using a bike to save our lungs to using it to promote peace isn't that big of a stretch. However, I also think that most other peace groups don't really promote biking because it's a hard sell. It's not so hard to get a person to come out of their lives for one day and march in the streets. It is hard to get them to make a huge lifestyle change like trading in the car for a bike. Peace groups are already seen as rather radical by american standards, so I don't think they want to push the envelope by promoting bikes and dissing cars. However, if the last peace march here in NYC is an indicator, I feel that people are slowly getting the message. The screams and cheers and enthusiasm that the Bike Bloc got from the walking protesters was so amazing that I feel next time we will see more and more of those people joining the ranks of bike protesters. NYC and SF protesters are both leading the way with huge bike peace protests and I feel that this type of thing will continue to spread throughout the country.
All original content Copyright © 2005 cicle.org. All rights reserved.
NYC CM Timeline
On the last Friday of every month in over 300 cities around the world, cyclists, roller blader's, boarders, etc...come together for a festive rolling celebration. It's an unorganized coincidence with no leaders and no set agenda. People come together for many reasons, to assert their right to cleaner air, less congestion, safer roads, and to celebrate and ride in solidarity with other cyclists and like minded individuals. Critical Mass is a movement, not an organization; no two riders participate for exactly the same reasons.
TIME'S UP! and four of its volunteers Bill DiPaola, Matthew Roth, Leah Rorvig and Brandon Neubauer are being sued by the City of New York, which is attempting to prohibit the group from promoting or participating in Critical Mass, a leaderless monthly ride. The city filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the group TIME'S UP! from promoting or advertising events that the city alleges to be illegal. The lawsuit also states that TIME'S UP! and the general public cannot participate in riding or gathering in the usual CM meeting place of Union Square, a City park. It claims that any event whatsoever with 20 or more persons requires a permit. The lawsuit is very broad and could have major implications on free speech and the freedom of assembly in New York City. Because of the potential breadth of the case and the likelihood of a countersuit, TIME'S UP! is facing huge legal fees, even though a number of attorneys are working pro bono.
When a city or state attempts to curtail citizens civil rights, the ramifications can spread like a forest fire that indiscriminately crosses over state lines, except that a forest fire doesn’t think tactically, city and state authority do. If one state passes a law, it is not unusual to see the exact same or similar law being adopted in another state, because the law has already been successfully implemented elsewhere, therefore setting a precedent. Thus if the city of New York is successful in their case against TIME’S UP! don’t be surprised when your city or state decides to do the very same thing. The thing to remember is how much easier it will be for your city to pass a similar law if NYC wins in the courts.